A fresh review of
the case—Many clients believe that their trial attorney is better
suited to handle their appeal because he or she knows the case so
thoroughly. However, a new appellate attorney brings no commitment
to the issues that were raised at trial. We are, therefore, able to
decide objectively which issues are best advanced on appeal. Because
appellate counsel was not trial counsel, appellate counsel will examine
the case objectively and will not hesitate to identify and raise errors
made at trial. We might see things the trial attorney may have missed,
downplay an argument or direction the trial attorney took, or emphasize
arguments or facts the trial attorney thought less important. A new,
outside appellate counsel views the case the same way the appellate
court does—from a cold record.
An understanding
of the trial errors and how to develop appellate arguments—Appellate
counsel understands what trial errors to look for and how to develop
those errors into successful arguments on appeal. We are able to cull
from the trial record those portions of the voluminous record which
are pertinent to the appeal. "[W]innowing out weaker arguments on
appeal and focusing on those more likely to prevail…is the hallmark
of effective appellate advocacy." Commonwealth v. Sowell, 34
Mass. App. Ct. 229, 233 (1993) (Jacobs, J.) An appellate specialist
is able to identify and frame the issues that are the subject of the
appeal.
An understanding
of the established precedent and developing law—Appellate counsel
is often more familiar with the issues and arguments likely to be
successful on appeal. We have a better understanding of patterns of
appellate decisions and keep abreast of issues in the appellate courts.
Sustained, uninterrupted
devotion to development of the appeal—"The bottom line is that
good, clear, persuasive writing takes skill, and it takes time—time
with few distractions in order to provide the opportunity for sustained
focus. That sustained devotion to one task often is difficult for
busy trial lawyers who have many other matters to attend to in the
course of a day. And even if a lawyer has the time, not everyone has
the inclination to roll up his or her sleeves and do the hard thinking,
analyzing, drafting, and synthesizing jobs that go into good appellate
briefs." Nancy Winkelman, Just a Brief Writer?, Litigation,
Summer 2003 at 50.